Gholamreza Ghahari; Samad Shadfar; Hamid Hosseini Marandi
Abstract
Erosion and sediment resulting from it, is one of the most important factors in watershed management. The estimation of sediment yield and prioritization of watersheds in terms of water erosion is the main objectives of watershed management. One of the ways to estimate soil erosion and sediment yield ...
Read More
Erosion and sediment resulting from it, is one of the most important factors in watershed management. The estimation of sediment yield and prioritization of watersheds in terms of water erosion is the main objectives of watershed management. One of the ways to estimate soil erosion and sediment yield is to use empirical models. The aim of this research is to evaluate the efficiency of the EPM Model in Fars Province. To examine this, five small watersheds were selected in Fars Province. Five basins in which the earth dams and check dams were built were selected. There is no overflow from these dams in rainfall events and the most of them was made near to 10 years. The amount of sediment deposited in upstream of the reservoirs was calculated by means of precision mapping. Deposit bulk density was determined in the field to convert the volume into the weight. In parallel, the sediment yield of the basins was determined by EPM Model. Results showed that the minimum and maximum sediment yield measurements varied from 0.89 to 2.62 tonh-1y-1, but the estimated sediment was between 3.3 to 6 tonh-1y-1. The results of the relative error of estimation of EPM Model in each of the studied basins showed an over estimation in all basins (minimum 121.5 and maximum 447.2 percent). The Relative Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE) of the model was calculated as 2.39, which indicates a too much error of the model. Statistical analysis results comparison of actual sediment yields of watersheds with estimated values by model, using paired t-test, shows that there is a significant difference between these values (t=8.728 and sig.=0.001). According to the presented findings, the results of this model estimation for the investigated areas are not accepted.
Abdolrasoul Shafiey Dastjerdi; Mohammad Hossein Mahdian; Kourosh Kamali; Hamid Hoseyni Marandi
Abstract
Entrance of high volume of floodwater containing huge amount of suspended sediments into the floodwater spreading networks which deposits sediments, as well as infiltration of soluble materials and fine grained, gradually changes the infiltration rate of soils. The aims of this project is to study the ...
Read More
Entrance of high volume of floodwater containing huge amount of suspended sediments into the floodwater spreading networks which deposits sediments, as well as infiltration of soluble materials and fine grained, gradually changes the infiltration rate of soils. The aims of this project is to study the quantity and the process of changes made in the soil of Saravan floodwater spreading station. This research has tried to use direct method of infiltration rate measurement, using double ring infiltrometer in two separate time periods of one year each, and to compare it to the experimental area. In order to specify overall situation of infiltration rates in terms of increase or decrease in second period of measurement in comparison to the first one, and as far as data were not distributed normally, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The results showed no significant difference between two separate measurement periods due to few number of floodwater occurrences (three times) in addition to short time interval of one year between the two measurement periods. To determine changing rate of infiltration between strips and between the strips and the experimental field, as far as abnormal distribution of data in this arrangement were concerned, Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Results indicated that the three strips of flood spreading area have no significant difference (at five percent probability level) in two periods of measurement, but the strip related to experimental area has significant difference with other three strips and in both measurement periods. In other words, infiltration rates of all strips under floodwater spreading have been decreased in relation to the experimental area. Moreover, the results were explanatory that only one of the rectangular in both measurement periods had significant difference with experimental rectangular (at five percent probability level) and all the other rectangular have had no significant differences with each other and in comparison to the experimental one, in none of periods of measurement. Main reason of this difference is also related to the thicker sediments deposits in rectangular location, compared to other blocks. Also, infiltration rate decreased by 55.94 percent in flood spreading area compared to experimental area during one-year timeframe and 3.23 percent of reduction.
